Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realjamesh

Add links
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as a blatant hoax by Drmies. (non-admin closure) Blablubbs|talk 15:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Realjamesh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Realjamesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ugh. This article, like it's predecessor is nothing short of a blatant fabrication. Every single source is paid for spam from blackhat SEO sites and in fact, one is a very poorly done photoshop of a legitimate newspaper, which he was not featured in. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 16:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. 102.64.130.29 (talk) 17:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 102.64.130.29 (talk) 17:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources. MER-C 17:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - these "sources" all reek of spam, and there is zero coverage in reliable sources. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this person is a 15-year-old kid. There is a need to respect the privacy of minors, even if they are their parents do not act as if they have any privacy. It also is unsightly if we have an article that comes off as criticizing someone for not stucking with a program of making minecraft videos very long that they initiated at 14. This is not the stuff notability is made of.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom; and hopefully blacklist several of the "sources" used. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - notability is lacking and based on unreliable sources. TimSmit (talk) 01:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - realjamesh is the best even if he is controversial 94.51.20.234 (talk) 07:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Its so clear from [1][2][3][4][5] and [6] that hes notable like does it matter if hes controversial just protect the page.Realjameshfan (talk) 07:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC) — Realjameshfan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Keep - he was written about in The New York Age by Emma and the Los Angeles Tribune 77.45.248.154 (talk) 07:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per all above. Spam verging on complete bollocks. Sourcing is primarily dodgy SEO crap; none of which contributes a red cent to notability. Wikipedia is not for promotion. --Jack Frost (talk) 10:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


References

  1. ^ Slippin, I. Caught U. (2020-12-29). "realjamesh Removes Music from Digital Stores | Here's why". Getmybuzzup. Archived from the original on 2021-01-04. Retrieved 2021-01-04.
  2. ^ ForUs, eSports (2021-01-05). "realjamesh hints at playing Survival Minecraft again". ESportsForUs. Archived from the original on 2021-01-05. Retrieved 2021-01-05. A few more episodes were made....realjamesh stopped posting any Minecraft content to his channel
  3. ^ "realjamesh launches 'Verified Handles' service to combat impersonation | The Los Angeles Tribune". Los Angeles Tribune. 2020-11-23. Archived from the original on 2021-01-04. Retrieved 2021-01-04.
  4. ^ admin (2020-12-27). "realjamesh – The Man Behind JEM Media". Epi express. Archived from the original on 2020-12-27. Retrieved 2021-01-04.
  5. ^ Brown, Richard (2020-12-27). "realjamesh gets hacked on Instagram, account now restored". USA Reformer. Archived from the original on 2021-01-04. Retrieved 2021-01-04.
  6. ^ Perkins, Emma (2021-01-05). "Why Did realjamesh Private His Twitter Account?". The New York Age. Archived from the original on 2021-01-05. Retrieved 2021-01-05. If James does have political views and if he uses Twitter for following and most importantly, liking the tweets of controversial political figures, then that would explain why he has hidden both his liked tweets and his following list.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Realjamesh&oldid=1171898708"