User talk:Extraordinary Writ

By far the funniest and most clever Wikipedia page I randomly stumbled on. Kudos. The fish genuinely made me laugh out loud — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumtimz I B Learnin (talk • contribs) 07:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Post-move cleanup

Re Talk:Cretan school#Requested move 25 April 2024, will you be doing some of the post-move cleanup work on these, per Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Cleaning up after the move? Dicklyon (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Looks like Mellk has done some of it already, but I've taken care of the rest. I'm not sure how sources capitalize "Late Cretan School", so you're welcome to change that as well if necessary. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Much appreciated. Dicklyon (talk) 03:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

AFC Reviewers

Hey, as you suggested in response to my PERM request, 'Trying AfC reviewing first might be a good idea,' I have submitted a request for the AFC Helper script. Please approve it so that I can review and decline articles that don't meet the requirements. Grabup (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

I don't typically review those requests—Primefac does. If you want my opinion, though, it's that you should spend a couple of months getting more experience with deletion before applying for additional advanced permissions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion. Could you advise me on which deletion process I should focus on gaining more experience with? Grabup (talk) 03:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Just keep working on CSDs and especially AfDs. Notability can't be fully understood in just a couple of weeks—it takes time to recognize some of the nuances. Try participating in AfDs where several people disagree with each other. Anyone can !vote delete in the easy discussions, but being able to make a source-based and policy/guideline-based argument in a more complicated case is what really matters. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Sure, I am actively working on CDSs. Only today, I found 8 spam self-promotional drafts (more can found), which I reported and will be deleted. As for AFDs, I agree everyone can vote delete, but most of the time, I mention guidelines like WP:NPOL, WP:GNG, WP:ACTOR, WP:MUSIC, and more. After your and Spicy’s comments, I am now adding my votes while briefly discussing why the article should be deleted. For example, you can see this [1],[2]. Thanks for the suggestions, I am learning more day by day. Grabup (talk) 08:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

@Extraordinary Writ: Hi there,

I hope you are well. It's been a month since my PERM was declined, and I'd like to get feedback on my eligibility to get NPP right based on my AfDs, CSDs, and AfC reviews. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 18:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Grabup. It looks like you've been doing good work since we last talked. You are still moving very quickly, and in my opinion spending another month or two at AfC and AfD would a good idea. I see you've nominated a few articles at AfD recently; this is a good way to show you can identify non-notable articles on your own. By the way, most of what new page patrollers do can actually be done by anyone: just go to Special:NewPagesFeed, select "new page patrol", and look for articles that need to be CSDed, AfDed, tagged for notability, etc. This is a good chance to practice. Anyways, it's up to you when you want to make the PERM request; the reviewing admin (who won't be me) will decide at that point whether you have enough experience. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. Cheers! GrabUp - Talk 06:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

• Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
• Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
• Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
• Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
• Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
• Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
• Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
• Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:LUGSTUBS2

Hello. I noticed you carried out the mass move of pages associated with WP:LUGSTUBS. Today a few links popped up for R2 deletion, which were left behind from moves that cited WP:LUGSTUBS2. It seems as though this list should have been draftified, but no one ever went ahead and did so. I was wondering if you might be up to the task? Pinging @BilledMammal as proposer / the person who added the Template:Special draft tag to the original list. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, there was a lot of wording in the WP:LUGSTUBS2 closure about moving slowly and cautiously, so I don't think anyone was ever comfortable mass-moving them. Maybe BilledMammal can tell us where the process currently stands. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Looks like we'd need to tweak Template:Special draft. It links specifically to WP:LUGSTUBS and doesn't allow me to link to WP:LUGSTUBS2 instead. I'd be fine to work to mass tag and then move these to draft space, but I think we'd need that worked out first. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

It looks like there's been some discussion recently at Wikipedia talk:Lugstubs 2 list—apparently a pretty high proportion need to be redirected rather than draftified. Separating out the redirectable ones probably needs to be the first priority (BilledMammal had mentioned figuring that out via Quarry). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Oh perfect, thanks. I'll follow up there instead of bugging you about it! Thank you! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Jimmy neutron the third (15:46, 9 May 2024)

how the heck did my edit get deleted when I corrected a simple mistake? --Jimmy neutron the third (talk) 15:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Jimmy neutron the third, it looks like your edit to Thousand-yard stare was reverted because the term can also be used outside the context of World War II. Your edit to Layla McCarter was reverted because it removed useful links to the articles Women's International Boxing Federation and Ronda Rousey. If you're looking for good ways to help, the list at Wikipedia:Task Center might be useful. Let me know if you have any questions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm still fairly new, so mistakes will be made, I hope my mistakes won't lead to my account being restricted in any way. I'll check out the Task Center soon Jimmy neutron the third (talk) 16:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Caireau (19:17, 13 May 2024)

Hello! I've created an article recently that I realize has a Spanish translation. How do I connect these two articles in the "Languages" tab on the top right of the "article space" page? --Caireau (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Caireau! This is kind of hard to explain, so if you want, feel free to just tell me the two articles you want connected and I can take care of it for you. But here are the steps:

1. Go to the Spanish Wikipedia article.
2. From the "Herramientas" menu (top right), choose "Elemento de Wikidata".
3. You are now on Wikidata, which is part of the Wikipedia "family" of sites. Click "log in" and sign in with your same Wikipedia username and password.
4. Where it says "Wikipedia (1 entry)", click "edit".
5. Type "en" (for English) into the "wiki" field".
6. Copy-and-paste the name of the English Wikipedia article (the one you created) into the "page" field.
7. Click "publish". Done!

It really shouldn't be so hard to do something so simple, but c'est la vie, I guess. Let me know if you have any other questions! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Beautiful! Just got it done.

Thanks for such clear instructions and a quick reply!! Caireau (talk) 04:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Prwiz33 (20:05, 15 May 2024)

hello, is it true thatg you can not edit your own wikipedia page? --Prwiz33 (talk) 20:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Prwiz33, it is strongly discouraged—see this page for an explanation of why. If there's already an article about you, this page will let you request changes to it; the suggestions will be reviewed by other editors to make sure they're unbiased and appropriate. If there isn't already an article about you, it's almost never a good idea to create one yourself. Let me know if you have any other questions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Shama72220 (09:08, 17 May 2024)

Hi --Shama72220 (talk) 09:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Shama72220! Let me know if you have any questions about editing Wikipedia. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Wanted to add this useful and relevant info

Hi, Can I add this below para in any of the existing articles on Wikipedia? Can be Online Food Ordering, may be under Type >> Delivery platforms with a reference: " There exists one delivery platform in the United Kingdom, named as Fusion Kitchen allowing restaurants to sell food online through their delivery platform with 0% Commission, for both delivery and pickup. https://theprint.in/ani-press-releases/fusion-kitchen-celebrates-five-years-of-culinary-excellence-and-global-growth-amidst-0-per-cent-commission-milestone/1987957/. Can you suggest if this can go elsewhere ? Lakshmi VB Narsimhan (talk) 06:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Adding that kind of detail about one non-notable company would be undue and promotional, particularly if it's just sourced to a press release. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

What sources or citations or achievements will make a company notable??, is it a Funded Company? Or Listed Company etc.? Lakshmi VB Narsimhan (talk) 05:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

A company is notable if it's been covered in detail by multiple independent and reliable sources (see WP:NCORP). Being funded or listed doesn't guarantee notability. But regardless, you shouldn't be trying to use broad articles like Online food ordering to promote a single company, whether notable or not. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Solidance (15:32, 22 May 2024)

Hello Bob! This is Dan. I got a sandboxed entry. I wonder how and when can I get it into the wild. I appreciate your advice. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Solidance/sandbox Regards, D. --Solidance (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Dan. I've added a box to your draft with a blue button that says "Submit the draft for review!"—when you're ready, push that button and it'll go into the queue for review. Before you do that, though, it's important to cite reliable sources (books, newspapers, magazine, trustworthy websites, etc.) that are independent of the Solidance project and talk about about it in detail. Reviewers will be looking for those kinds of sources to see whether Solidance is eligible for an article, and if there aren't any of those sources, it may be too soon for it to have an article at this time. Let me know if you have any questions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Claimed permissions on user page

An editor who has already had a few alt accounts (already reported to SPI), now claims to be a pending changes reviewer using the infobox {{User wikipedia/Reviewer}} on their userpage. I went to WP:PERM and WP:PERM/PCR, and I could not find their request. Could not see anything in their editing history either. Let it go or should something be done? --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

That's odd. Probably just a misunderstanding, but I'll leave a message for them. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Henry Akpan David on Electrocompaniet (22:20, 28 May 2024)

Hello Please how to put my pic and phone number --Henry Akpan David (talk) 22:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello Henry Akpan David. The purpose of Wikipedia is to write an encyclopedia, not to provide information about non-notable people. Contributors to Wikipedia can create a user page to talk briefly about themselves (click here to create yours), but it can be deleted if it's used for self-promotion. (For privacy reasons, you shouldn't put your phone number on Wikipedia.) Let me know if you have any questions about how to contribute to the encyclopedia. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Ashikur Rahman710 (15:20, 3 June 2024)

Hello --Ashikur Rahman710 (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello Ashikur Rahman710! Let me know if you have any questions about editing Wikipedia. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)