Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Amazonfire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Amazonfire

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Amazonfire (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Blue011011 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
220.212.98.240 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
219.66.47.183 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
211.3.114.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

миражinred (speak, my child...) 18:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

They are SPAs with a history of reverting and engaging in edit wars by calling other editors "Korean vandals" or accusing other users of censorship. миражinred (speak, my child...) 18:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

All of them have edited Japan or Korea-related articles. They have edited So Far from the Bamboo Grove with...

Same edit and very similar edit summary [1] [2]

The same edits by different IPs and accounts [3] [4] [5] [6]

Exactly the same edit summary [7] [8]

Comments

• There is already a request for CheckUser for Amazonfire. миражinred (speak, my child...) 01:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
• Oy. Another monster RFCU: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amazonfire. Jehochman ^Talk 04:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
• Recommend waiting until RFCU clears this one up (wow). On a side note, reversion of a previous edit does not necessarily mean the edits are "similar", it means they are identical. Summaries are similar, but so are many other peoples. Noting a trend here, it is not wrong for people to edit from an IP address or even have multiple accounts, as long as they are not doing so for malicious purposes or to get around rules. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Conclusions

RFCU results were inconclusive. I agree here. This is possible but not enough to block. Resubmit if more proof becomes available. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

---