Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 1[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 1, 2020.

Category:Electronic music festivals in The Netherlands[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirect category, left over after the category was renamed to the correct Category:Electronic music festivals in the Netherlands. I don't see the need to keep this one, it's unlikely people will search for this specific capitalisation. Or is it normal to have category redirects from alternative capitalisations? Robofish (talk) 22:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(I reviewed the guidance at WP:Category redirects that should be kept, and I don't think this qualifies.) Robofish (talk) 22:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There are no uses or links to this redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep, some people might mistakenly capitalize the T in "the," but I don't know about it with there being no links to the redirect. Regards, SONIC678 05:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Any search will find a match to the correct article irrespective of the capitalization. Keeping it will only legitimize the incorrect capitalization if used as a link in articles. Senator2029 “Talk” 10:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cortirion[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 9#Cortirion

See how I circle[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Tally Hall (band)#Post-Good & Evil. Now mentioned at target. (non-admin closure) buidhe 09:56, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not listed at the target article —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Philippine Television Network[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 11#Philippine Television Network

Ryan Lindsay (artist)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While this is Ryan Tyler's birth first and middle name, I can't find any evidence that he has ever been known by this name. The disambiguator is also not ideal for a country singer. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Enwiki has nothing about an artist called Ryan Lindsay. There is the husband of John Ross Palmer but the article doesn't say he's an artist and doesn't establish notability. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Due to its uncertain meaning and high potential for inaccurate targeting. Senator2029 “Talk” 10:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kiwistan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. 14 years! Don't think we list redirects at WP:HOAXLIST but still! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can barely find any usage of this phrase online; WP:MADEUP? TheAwesomeHwyh 20:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete completely unnecessary. CycloneYoris talk! 23:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I Love You 3000[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. To be fair, it was the only good part of that film ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. I recognize that this is a meme associated with the film, but without any mention at the target I don't see how this redirect is useful. I would suggest deletion unless a due mention can be added. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Great Pyramid of Ceres[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In line with the original page move, this should probably be deleted to keep it from popping up in the search bar as it is misleading and not mentioned in the target. I came across this in a move discussion over Great Pyramid. All relevant history is captured in existing article. -- 2pou (talk) 20:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I'd say it's a non-useful redirect. Retaining it might serve to perpetuate this silly terminology. WolfmanSF (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

MOS:Dumb quotes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Provided justifications are reasonable, withdrawing nomination. signed, Rosguill talk 22:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of dumb in the target, I'm honestly mystified as to what was intended here. Delete unless a justification can be provided? signed, Rosguill talk 20:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Offensive image[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was point both to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Offensive images. (non-admin closure) feminist | wear a mask 04:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting help from the community in deciding on the best target for these. The first one has been pointing to the dab page Wikipedia:Censorship since 2006 (having briefly oscillated between this target and the page on meta m:Censorship). The plural form targeted the same meta page 2005–2006, was then repointed to MediaWiki:Bad image list in 2006 and then retargeted again in 2014 to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Offensive images. Pings to the most recently involved editors: Ardric47, Jarble, CesarB, Korg. – Uanfala (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sovietization of Poland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous search term, could also refer to the establishment of the Provisional Government of the Republic of Poland, the Provisional Government of National Unity, or the Polish People's Republic. Most Scholar search results seem to use "sovietization" (or at least, sovietization in the context of Eastern Bloc states) to refer to the 1945–1956 period. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Austro-Hungarian Empire (Romania)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Romania was never part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Super Ψ Dro 18:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ppl[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely. TheAwesomeHwyh 15:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dlt. We don't need redirects from slangy Internet abbreviations to major topics. Note also the possible confusion with PPL (gene), which like most genes may have different allele frequencies in different populations. Narky Blert (talk) 18:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. As above. Any confusion can be solved with a simple search. In addition, nobody would reasonably expect an encyclopedia entry to use a slangy abbreviation. Valkyrino (talk) 06:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

0bama[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Unlikely misspelling (the o is replaced with a zero here). TheAwesomeHwyh 15:32, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Romaminority in Romania[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A basically useless misspell (0 views in the last 30 days). Super Ψ Dro 15:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Giant Sherpha[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor character too minor to be mentioned in either the target article or List of Indiana Jones characters. I don't believe this name is even given to him during the actual action of the film. See the discussions for Ratty Nepalese and Mean Mongolian for similar nominations. Hog Farm (talk) 15:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. We really do not need redirects from or DAB page mentions of every minor character in every book or film ever written or made; nor indeed mentions of them in the relevant articles. BTW, is Sherpha a misspelling of "Sherpa"? Narky Blert (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mean Mongolian[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, very minor character. I believe he's only ever named in the credits. Not mentioned here, and shouldn't be. Hog Farm (talk) 14:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nonsense or complete sentences[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless cross-namespace redirect, ruins the joke on the target page. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 09:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:XNR. It's linked in the current target, making it a cross-namespace WP:SELFREDIRECT. Narky Blert (talk) 11:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I suspect that "nonsense and complete sentences" was a redlink in the article to prove the point, and somebody thought it was necessary to make it a bluelink. Hog Farm (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per others. --Soumyabrata talk contribs subpages 15:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. CycloneYoris talk! 23:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as harmful. — J947 [cont] 23:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why do you think it's harmful? TheDiaperPinez37 (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • @TheDiaperPinez37: If anyone searches this up they are almost certainly not looking for a subplot of an obscure humourous essay that no one but the occasional Wikipedian knows. — J947 [cont] 21:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • So you think that not many people even know about the humorous side of Wikipedia? TheDiaperPinez37 (talk) 01:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • @TheDiaperPinez37: Look. When a reader searches this up wanting to find their way to a valid topic they find an extremely obscure in-joke that they are going to be completely puzzled about for no reason whatsoever than one editor's random selfish desire. Do you want that to happen? — J947 [cont] 01:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
            • Question is, WHY would anyone want to search it in the first place? It was made exclusively to be accessible from the humorous page so that when someone would click it they wouldn't end up at a dead end. TheDiaperPinez37 (talk) 02:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
              • People search for weird things. Plus, it defeats the purpose of the point to have this link be blue; the point is that in the sentence Always link red links, especially with nonsense or complete sentences. the link should be red. This is becoming ridiculous. — J947 [cont] 03:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trance (2019 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did not release in 2019. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Has incoming links and hundreds of hits per day. I see no harm. Station1 (talk) 05:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Station1 – this isn't detrimentally confusing to anyone and is helping huge numbers of people. — J947 [cont] 05:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and tag as {{R from incorrect name}}. I haven't checked the sources, but on the face of the article I wouldn't be at all surprised if some give the wrong year. No real possibility of confusion with other films called Trance, except for the obscure Austrian one with no article in either English or German WP. Narky Blert (talk) 07:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - A ton of views a day, deleting this will be detrimental. Hog Farm (talk) 15:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Social recession[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Note that per WP:R#DELETE criterion 10, a vote to "create an article" is equivalent to a vote for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Social recession" is a real, if very recent thing; see, e.g., https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/america-faces-social-recession/608548/. It is not the same thing as a recession, nor is it mentioned in the recession article. Dan Bloch (talk) 02:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom to encourage article creation. Narky Blert (talk) 11:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Convert into an article using information from that source and anything else suitabe. Regards, SONIC678 14:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Sonic678: I don't think this !vote is helpful. I recognise that an article could be created, but it seems you're not going to create it, are I think it's unreasonable to expect a closer to create one. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    OK. Sorry about that. Regards, SONIC678 14:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK or convert into an article. Here are some more sources: [2][3][4][5]. buidhe 08:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Intternnett[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whyy woulld anyonne ssearch thiis typpo? TheAwesomeHwyh 02:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New+Zealand[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 21:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely+redirect. TheAwesomeHwyh 02:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep; harmless and useless to delete per RHARMFUL. This nomination accomplishes nothing. — J947 [cont] 02:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per+nom. Implausible+redirect. --Soumyabrata talk contribs subpages 05:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • And how does one's view of implausibility matter? — J947 [cont] 05:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Implausible misspelling, unnecessary clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 07:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Whoever actually got to New Zealand by using this redirect needs to get a new space bar or keyboard. Anyway, it's a pointless redirect and people would probably just go to this redirect instead. Kori (@) 01:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's not pointless; the pageviews demonstrate that. There is nothing to be gained by deleting this redirect – other than annoying readers for no reason whatsoever. — J947 [cont] 04:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Using + separators in URIs instead of spaces is a common method of avoiding the ugly %20 encoding so its not implausible and page views show it is actually used. So deletion would be harmful and not bring any benefits. Thryduulf (talk) 20:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. I don't support mass creation of this sort of thing, but it's pretty standard for + to show up in a url rather than a space. It's supposed to be just as part of a form parameter (see these two stack overflow questions: [6] [7]) but in historical practice pops up elsewhere, especially when coming from search urls. No harm, potentially helpful, no need to delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Civitates Foederatae Americae[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why would anybody search for this in Latin? TheAwesomeHwyh 01:54, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:RFFL. No real connection between the United States and the Latin language. Hog Farm (talk) 02:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Unlike the United Kingdom, English is not a de jure official language in the United States. Therefore, the name of the country should be translated to many languages, even in Bengali (মার্কিন যুক্তরাষ্ট্র). --Soumyabrata talk contribs subpages 05:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:RLOTE. Note that in Latin, the three words could validly be arranged in any of the six possible orders. Narky Blert (talk) 07:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Redirect is absurd, users would simply translate a title and find the article. It is doubtful that anyone would type it in Latin. Kori (@) 01:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:RFFL. buidhe 08:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - The reason for its creation isn't because someone might type it in, but to correctly link within the encyclopedia. The term was already listed on the disambiguation page CFA and linked to the United States article. Senator2029 “Talk” 04:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

THE AMERICAN UNITED STATES[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 21:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely term in all caps. TheAwesomeHwyh 01:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dark and Bloody Ground[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be the name of a book about the history of Kentucky and a film set in Kentucky, so the less-common state nickname isn't the only potential usage. WP:REDLINK might apply for the book. Hog Farm (talk) 00:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep This phrase is used in a lot of older works about Kentucky and was a popular folk etymology of its name that isn't currently discussed in the article, but probably should be. If an article on a book or movie appears in the future, it's already covered by existing policy. --Spasemunki (talk) 01:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Until it is mentioned in the target, with a source, it fails WP:V. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eating babies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this is not the only potential meaning of this - Human cannibalism is another. Probably better off with deletion. Hog Farm (talk) 00:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I've never heard this term used of Swift's pamphlet. Infant cannibalism is not exclusive to humans. Narky Blert (talk) 07:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This redirect may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, disturbing and unnecessary. CycloneYoris talk! 23:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_1&oldid=1079936932"