Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 9 February 11 >

February 10[edit]

Category:MEPs for the United Kingdom 2019–2024[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:MEPs for the United Kingdom 2019–2020. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These people only served as Members of the European Parliament until the UK's departure from the EU at the end of January 2020. See the corresponding list, List of members of the European Parliament for the United Kingdom, 2019–20. Robofish (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support speedy. buidhe 03:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Identity[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 21#Category:Identity

Category:English rock oboists[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 21#Category:English rock oboists

Category:English rock violists[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 21#Category:English rock violists

Category:Eukaryotes by conservation status[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 20:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category has just 3 members and 2 parents so it isn't necessary. The proposed upmerge would mean that at Category:Biota by conservation status the technical jargon of "Eukaryotes" is replaced by "Animals" and "Plants". DexDor (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - unnecessary indeed. Oculi (talk) 22:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, one of many unnecessary categories created by Caftaric to provide categories for every node in the phylogenetic tree of life. And no prokaryotes or viruses have been assigned a conservation status; all organisms with a conservation status are eukaryotes. Plantdrew (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge. I guess it is premature to delete because there is still an entire tree under it. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Venom films[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 21#Category:Venom films

Category:Harley Quinn films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Upmerge Timrollpickering (Talk) 20:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Too few entries. No need for this category. ★Trekker (talk) 21:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural oppose, if not kept, this category and the one below should be merged somewhere. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Category:Films by character was created in July of 2019. It, and all the single character subcats - including this one - should be deleted as overcategorisation. - jc37 02:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 14:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Animated Harley Quinn films[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 21#Category:Animated Harley Quinn films

Category:Catwoman films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Catwoman in other media and where necessary Category:Films based on works by Bill Finger and Category:Films based on works by Bob Kane per recent precedents. – Fayenatic London 11:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Too few entires. Only one of the films in this category is actally a film about this character as opposed to a film where the character has a minor supporting role. ★Trekker (talk) 21:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural oppose, if not kept, this category and all film categories below should be merged somewhere. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Category:Films by character was created in July of 2019. It, and all the single character subcats - including this one - should be deleted as overcategorisation. - jc37 02:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 14:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Animated Catwoman films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Catwoman in other media and where necessary Category:Films based on works by Bill Finger and Category:Films based on works by Bob Kane per recent precedents. The contents are already in subcats of the other parent Category:Animated films based on DC Comics. – Fayenatic London 09:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Too few entries. Category is not needed or helpful. ★Trekker (talk) 21:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural oppose, if not kept, this category and all film categories below should be merged somewhere. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Category:Films by character was created in July of 2019. It, and all the single character subcats - including this one - should be deleted as overcategorisation. - jc37 02:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 14:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Middle-earth weapons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus Timrollpickering (Talk) 00:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is another small category that is full of redirect pages. ―Susmuffin Talk 05:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fair enough, then this is the most reasonable way to proceed indeed. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:16, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I*Delete per Hog, moving the redirects into Category:Middle-earth redirects. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - 2 articles and 20 redirects, which I suspect will not all be to the same place is perhaps enough to keep the category. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - the redirects are categorised in an exemplary fashion and the category is far from small. Oculi (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (or merge) but do not move the redirects. Christian75 (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 14:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Middle-earth rings and jewels[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus Timrollpickering (Talk) 00:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These categories should be combined, as they are far too small to exist independently. ―Susmuffin Talk 05:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 14:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Attacks in Nigeria in 2012[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 21#Category:Attacks in Nigeria in 2012

Category:Files copyrighted by the Wikimedia Foundation[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 21#Category:Files copyrighted by the Wikimedia Foundation

Category:The Family Channel original programming[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:The Family Channel (American TV network, founded 1990) original programming. – Fayenatic London 11:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The Family Channel is ambiguous as there are 3 networks with this name. The Family Channel (American TV network), Family Channel (Canadian TV network) and one without an article that leads to History of Freeform (TV channel)#The Family Channel. This category belongs to the one without an article. Not sure how to disambiguate this here as "(American)" is ambiguous. Gonnym (talk) 05:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 14:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Discovery Home original programming[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 17:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Discovery Home leads to a disambiguation page. The network's other name was "Discovery Home & Leisure" but that too leads to Discovery Home & Leisure, a disambiguation page. Gonnym (talk) 05:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 14:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films directed by Kovelamudi Surya Prakash Rao[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 21#Category:Films directed by Kovelamudi Surya Prakash Rao

Category:Transmisogyny[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 20:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, currently only one article, one redirect and one subcategory. The subcategory does not have to be merged to Category:Misogyny because it is already part of Category:Violence against women. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:39, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 14:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Current cat is an an example of micro-slicing. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Trans men in film[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename Timrollpickering (Talk) 00:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename, the current titles suggest that these are topic categories about film, but in fact they are set categories containing films. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom Clearer scope. Dimadick (talk) 11:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • First preference delete, second preference rename. These categories are unnecessary compared to the perfectly fine Category:Transgender-related films, but the current titles make no sense whatsoever, so if they're kept they should definitely be renamed. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 14:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Stern School of Business alumni[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 17:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Match title of parent article New York University Stern School of Business. No editor should have to guess to find the title and search through the category structure to find the name of a category. Alansohn (talk) 13:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom To match the main article. Dimadick (talk) 14:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Moonshine by distilled drink[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 17:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category is an inappropriate way to categorize articles such as Tequila, Rum and Whisky. The category name ("... by ... drink") is also inappropriate for categorizing articles directly. DexDor (talk) 12:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lungless salamanders[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 17:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To match the name of the main article. — Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 04:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom, presuming that the article rename (more than a year ago) is uncontroversial. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Scientific name is more precise; it's not clear from the title that the category is intended to correspond to a taxon rather than a shared characteristic (there are lung-lacking salamanders in other families besides Plethodontidae; that is part of why the main article was moved to the scientific name title). Plantdrew (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Middle-earth buildings[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 17:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: All redirects. The subcat is decently-well populated, and is actually already included in the parent cat of this article. We can move the redirects to Category:Middle-earth redirects per WP:RCAT, and the subcat of castles and fortresses is already in the parent cat. Hog Farm (talk) 04:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_February_10&oldid=949589781"