Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vo-Na Imoru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 03:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vo-Na Imoru[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a diplomat for whom coverage seems to be in yearbooks, gazetteers etc. no in depth coverage that I can find. Mccapra (talk) 21:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sierra Leone-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mccapra, The chief of a large town as Voggu, and a dipplomat of an entire country to Yugoslavia is certainly notable enough to be on WIkipedia even if the only sources are in books that are easily verifiable on the internet. -Masssly (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

well the standard for biographies is WP:BASIC and that isn’t met here. Diplomats are not automatically notable and indeed most aren’t. Mccapra (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can see that some ambassadorial positions are quite likely to be inherently notable (eg permanent members of the UN security council), that said, we're not discussing a posting of that nature here. In the absence of sources, and my own searches revealed no SIGCOV, I cannot think of grounds where we might assume that satisfactory sources could exist which would demonstrate anything more than the quotidian activities of a diplomat. Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Diplomats are not inherently notable. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 03:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.