Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Larkana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Star Mississippi 01:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Larkana[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The press coverage received lacked depth or significance, failing to meet the WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either —Saqib (talk | contribs) 14:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 14:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 19:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't still get what you call PR. Though it may seem, but can't we check WP:BEFORE or any other way. This dawn.com author is a reporter per the articles written for the reliable news source. There is this from GBooks. In a search on news, I got many pop ups.here. All these are resourceful ways of checking the credibility of an article particularly to this one that focuses on Cancer(pharmaceutical) perhaps or whatever. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- SafariScribe, But it's mostly either trivial mentions or ROTM coverage. But GNG requires significant/in-depth coverage, which I haven't been able to find so far. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing but passing mentions in all sources at the article or linked in this discussion. Just because someone gave a speech there, or an awareness walk started there [1], doesn't mean that the institute itself is notable. Toadspike [Talk] 11:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:NONPROFIT. Government-funded institute focused on nuclear medicine. Nuclear technology-related articles are very notable in Pakistan case due to the amount of scruitny these projects face. There is a lot of coverage in academic journals about this topic. I found such in-depth article from an academic journal (Cutaneous malignant tumors: a profile of ten years at LINAR, Larkana-Pakistan). 2A04:4A43:897F:FEC5:F491:C67:1C73:8215 (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It was founded in 1956 so there is a lot of covereage in pre-internet offline references. A simple search on Google is not useful in such cases. Additional coverage here ([2]) Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy was in February reported to have sunk into grave disarray , with broken windowpanes , faulty drainage , poor sanitation and a shortage of staff and facilities seriously hampering... 2A04:4A43:96AF:FD5A:2833:13AD:96A9:2A1F (talk) 13:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.