User talk:Whimwhiz

A7s on Vinayshil Gautam & Jinu E Thomas[edit]

Hello Whimwhiz -- Thanks for helping out with new page patrol. I've declined the above A7s because both articles have clear claims of significance. A7 is reserved for articles where there is absolutely nothing that might confer potential notability, even if the subject does not appear to meet subject-specific guidelines. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 06:20, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I have learned Whimwhiz (talk) 06:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Battle of Nisa (1221)[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Battle of Nisa (1221), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/David Eribe[edit]

Just courtesy heads up since you moved the article. I have no fault with your move, it's their shenanigans to get it approved. Star Mississippi 13:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea that the article was deleted before. I only moved it per MOS as explained in the reason for moving the article Whimwhiz (talk) 05:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, no issue with that at all, and I defended your move at the AfD. You didn't have the history and the level of protection allowed the move. Star Mississippi 13:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/David Eribe. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]