User talk:Jamiebuba
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Love Depot[edit]
Hello, i have edited this to keep just the factual information about the brand on the wiki page. I request your review and approval, pls Lucifersam007 (talk) 12:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Question about YouTube Links[edit]
Hi! I've been working on a draft for Draft:Dan Mertzlufft. You took out some references and said "youtube, imbd, facebook are unreliable sources"
I understand, and I appreciate the guidance.
But my question is - sometimes a reliable source will post to YouTube (e.g. MSNBC has a YouTube page where they post some of their segments.) If there's a story where you can't find it on another source (e.g. they didn't keep it on actual MSNBC.com, or something like that, but it is indeed *from* an MSNBC segment which is trusted)... is *that* reliable? And if so, how can you mark that?
[Or in this case, on his page, I was trying to show the actual segment that aired on James Corden. I think I maybe had found it on the official James Corden facebook page. So, again, if it's something like that - that's something that aired on television from the source, is it ever reliable on Facebook etc? And if so, how do you specify that?]
Similarly, YouTube Originals is an actual company that pays people to make original content. If you're talking about the content being released - they release it on YouTube, so a link to the source seems like it could be relevant there?
So, I guess that's my general questions - are social media, YouTube, etc type links *ever* acceptable in certain circumstances, and if so, how do you specify that when writing an article? Thanks so much for your help! Wikipedian339 (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- If it is published on the Youtube channel of MSNBC it can be considered reliable. Social media links maybe accepted in certain circumstances. Hope this answers your question. Jamiebuba (talk) 01:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Please, kindly add more Categories (Chat With Term)talk 09:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)