User contributions for Jorge Stolfi
A user with 27,333 edits. Account created on 4 March 2004.
18 March 2024
- 10:3510:35, 18 March 2024 diff hist +255 User talk:Jorge Stolfi →Function - formal definition: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 10:0310:03, 18 March 2024 diff hist +619 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Definition issues: Reply Tag: Reply
19 February 2024
- 19:3919:39, 19 February 2024 diff hist +125 User talk:Jorge Stolfi →Typo?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:3919:39, 19 February 2024 diff hist 0 m Talk:History of money →Ideological confusion: Fixed typo "Gerber" -> "Graeber"
17 February 2024
- 16:2916:29, 17 February 2024 diff hist +801 Talk:History of money →The shekel was not a token for barley: new section Tag: New topic
- 12:1412:14, 17 February 2024 diff hist +340 Talk:History of money tally sticks
- 12:1312:13, 17 February 2024 diff hist −339 m Talk:Money rm entry in wrong page Tag: Manual revert
- 12:1112:11, 17 February 2024 diff hist +339 Talk:Money →Tally sticks: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
- 12:0512:05, 17 February 2024 diff hist +477 Talk:History of money →Ideological confusion: new section Tag: New topic
23 November 2023
- 14:4514:45, 23 November 2023 diff hist +91 Fiber (mathematics) →In naive set theory: clarifying formula
22 November 2023
- 18:0018:00, 22 November 2023 diff hist +2,096 Talk:Converse relation →"Inverse" is a much more common name than "converse": Again: Wikipedia should not be used to push for a nomenclature reform.
21 November 2023
- 20:3820:38, 21 November 2023 diff hist +368 User talk:D.Lazard →Reverted edits to the talk page: Sory for the mess.
- 20:3620:36, 21 November 2023 diff hist +198 User talk:D.Lazard →Yo Ho Ho: Sorry again
- 20:3420:34, 21 November 2023 diff hist +387 m User talk:D.Lazard Reverted edits by Jorge Stolfi (talk) to last version by JBW Tag: Rollback
- 20:3320:33, 21 November 2023 diff hist −755 User talk:D.Lazard →Yo Ho Ho: Deleted spurious "seasons greetings" message. Wikipedia is NOT a social network, and Talk pages are NOT for that purpose. Tag: Reverted
- 20:3120:31, 21 November 2023 diff hist +368 User talk:D.Lazard →Reverted edits to the talk page: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
20 November 2023
- 12:5412:54, 20 November 2023 diff hist +5 m Talk:Converse relation →"Inverse" is a much more common name than "converse": typo
- 12:5212:52, 20 November 2023 diff hist +15 m Talk:Converse relation →"Inverse" is a much more common name than "converse": tweaks
- 12:5112:51, 20 November 2023 diff hist +1,250 Talk:Converse relation →"Inverse" is a much more common name than "converse": Every function does have an inverse. But that is not the point: "inverse" is the name commonly used used when talking about RELATIONS.
19 November 2023
- 13:3713:37, 19 November 2023 diff hist +1,086 Talk:Converse relation →"Inverse" is a much more common name than "converse": Actually "inverse of a relation" is much more common than "converse of a relation"
18 November 2023
- 16:1116:11, 18 November 2023 diff hist +996 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Definition issues: Thanks Jurgen. Still unhappy, but I give up...
- 15:3715:37, 18 November 2023 diff hist +951 Talk:Converse relation →"Inverse" is a much more common name than "converse": new section Tag: New topic
16 November 2023
- 09:1509:15, 16 November 2023 diff hist +15 Fiber (mathematics) →top: fix link to inverse of relation
15 November 2023
- 22:3422:34, 15 November 2023 diff hist +11 Binary relation →top: Added "Inverse" as (much more common) synonym of "converse" Tag: Reverted
- 22:3222:32, 15 November 2023 diff hist +55 Converse relation →top: "See" for inverse proportion
- 22:2822:28, 15 November 2023 diff hist +185 Converse relation →top: "Inverse" is a widely used name for this concept (much more so than "converse").
- 22:1922:19, 15 November 2023 diff hist +747 Talk:Converse relation →Transposed or Converse: The name "inverse" is widely used and so MUST be given as a synonym of "converse".
- 22:0422:04, 15 November 2023 diff hist +1,153 Fiber (mathematics) In some fields one studies fibers with special properties, but the definition of fiber is still just f^{-1}(y). Added connection to equivalence classes.
- 21:5621:56, 15 November 2023 diff hist +287 Talk:T1 space →Rename article to "Separable space"
- 21:5021:50, 15 November 2023 diff hist +305 Talk:T1 space →Rename article to "Separable space": new section Tag: New topic
- 20:3820:38, 15 November 2023 diff hist +374 User talk:Jorge Stolfi →Proposed deletion of Alpha-Propiolactone: Bogus warning.
- 20:2920:29, 15 November 2023 diff hist +2,471 User talk:David Eppstein →Function (mathematics): new section Tag: New topic
- 19:5419:54, 15 November 2023 diff hist +887 User talk:D.Lazard →Reverted edits to the talk page: new section Tag: New topic
- 19:0819:08, 15 November 2023 diff hist −1 m Talk:Function (mathematics) →Discussion: typo Tag: Reverted
- 19:0719:07, 15 November 2023 diff hist +1,583 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Discussion: The "plain" definition as set of pairs is the only one that makes sense for all uses. The "labeled" definition is more cumbersome and its uses are often sloppy and incorrect. Surjective can be defined for "plain" functions too. Tag: Reverted
- 18:2418:24, 15 November 2023 diff hist +377 Function (mathematics) →top: The first sentence of an article must '''define''' the concept, not just say something interesting about it. (What does "associate" mean?) The set-theoretical definition is comprehensible by any interested reader, and is acceptable to all fields, even the abstruse ones who would define it in more indirect ways. Tag: Reverted
- 11:1811:18, 15 November 2023 diff hist −247 Fiber (mathematics) →top: There are no "two definitions of fiber". Algebraic topology have special requirements on fibrations, fiberspaces etc - not redefine fiber. Also the head section must define the term, not just say somethng interesting about it.
6 October 2023
- 22:1822:18, 6 October 2023 diff hist +468 User talk:Warrenmck →Clarity/POV issue: Reply Tag: Reply
2 October 2023
- 07:2007:20, 2 October 2023 diff hist +9 m User talk:Warrenmck →Clarity/POV issue: +However
- 07:1907:19, 2 October 2023 diff hist +1,633 User talk:Warrenmck →Clarity/POV issue: Won't fig the deletion of proto-Altaic, but protest the radical definition of "fringe".
18 September 2023
- 09:2309:23, 18 September 2023 diff hist +739 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proto-Altaic language →Proto-Altaic language: PS. Not "fringe" like Creeationism or Flat Earth, just "academic consensus does not consider the evidence convincing"
- 08:5608:56, 18 September 2023 diff hist +614 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proto-Altaic language →Proto-Altaic language: Keep but edit
15 September 2023
- 21:0021:00, 15 September 2023 diff hist −56 m Phaistos Disc →Word-related sign statistics: removed the italic markup on sign names, for consistency with the rest of the article. Note that the uppercase already does the job.
- 20:5020:50, 15 September 2023 diff hist +195 Phaistos Disc →Transcriptions: Note that the crack at the end of word A24 is considered to be an oblique stroke, for consistency with most published sources.
- 20:4820:48, 15 September 2023 diff hist +462 Phaistos Disc →"Paragraphs": Note that the oblique stroke commonly listed at the end of word A24 is actually just a crack.
14 September 2023
- 16:1616:16, 14 September 2023 diff hist −124 Phaistos Disc →Discovery: Removed redundant dimensions, given more correctly further on.
10 September 2023
- 18:2918:29, 10 September 2023 diff hist −33 Phaistos Disc →The text: Moved the image "transcription" to earlier in the section.
- 18:1618:16, 10 September 2023 diff hist +466 Phaistos Disc →The text: Moved the single-image "transcription" to the "Transcriptions" section. Added <hr/> at the end of Side B to account for the final oblique slash.
- 17:5317:53, 10 September 2023 diff hist +215 Phaistos Disc →Directionality: Clarified what it meant by "left-to-right reversed"
6 September 2023
- 09:2809:28, 6 September 2023 diff hist +6 Phaistos Disc Moved discussion of unreadable symbol to another section.
