User contributions for Dustfreeworld
A user with 5,795 edits. Account created on 29 December 2022.
6 June 2024
- 12:5012:50, 6 June 2024 diff hist +384 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:4812:48, 6 June 2024 diff hist +197 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:3812:38, 6 June 2024 diff hist +373 User talk:Dustfreeworld →Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:2912:29, 6 June 2024 diff hist +285 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: Link to original version Tag: Reply
- 12:2612:26, 6 June 2024 diff hist +34 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Discussion concerning Dustfreeworld: add back section heading (my mistake)
- 12:2312:23, 6 June 2024 diff hist −3,380 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: trim to meet word limit
- 03:2003:20, 6 June 2024 diff hist +289 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: Reply Tag: Reply
- 03:1403:14, 6 June 2024 diff hist −1 m Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Dustfreeworld: ce
- 03:1203:12, 6 June 2024 diff hist +587 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:3202:32, 6 June 2024 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: formatting
- 02:3002:30, 6 June 2024 diff hist +1,028 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: add
- 02:1302:13, 6 June 2024 diff hist +362 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:0402:04, 6 June 2024 diff hist +184 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: add (feelings of recipients and their loved ones)
- 01:5701:57, 6 June 2024 diff hist +10 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: emphasis (][WP:V]]). I don’t think this shows “a lack of competence” as someone said.
- 01:5301:53, 6 June 2024 diff hist +111 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: add
- 01:4901:49, 6 June 2024 diff hist +317 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: add (policies)
- 01:2801:28, 6 June 2024 diff hist +1,257 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: Reply Tag: Reply
5 June 2024
- 21:0721:07, 5 June 2024 diff hist +522 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:5420:54, 5 June 2024 diff hist +34 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: add
- 20:5120:51, 5 June 2024 diff hist +572 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:3320:33, 5 June 2024 diff hist −3 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld
- 20:3120:31, 5 June 2024 diff hist +422 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld: add
- 20:2020:20, 5 June 2024 diff hist +2,794 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Dustfreeworld
- 19:4019:40, 5 June 2024 diff hist +826 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:2619:26, 5 June 2024 diff hist +337 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: Oops Tag: Reply
- 19:0919:09, 5 June 2024 diff hist +793 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:0519:05, 5 June 2024 diff hist −2,194 Reiki Remove poorly sourced material (contentious labels) that may damage the reputation of Reiki practitioners / participants, per WP:PROVEIT: “Do not leave unsourced or poorly sourced material in an article if it might damage the reputation of … existing groups” Tag: Reverted
- 18:5718:57, 5 June 2024 diff hist +70 Reiki Tag materials that violates NPOV, per article’s talk page and consensus on NPOV notice board. Special:diff/1227423119 BTW, David specialises in cancer surgery, which means he provides some form of treatment to cancer patients, i.e. he is not independent and there can be COI. Also it’s just a potentially biased opinion piece / blog post from SBM. Not even a primary research. I don’t think such subpar source can support such exceptional/contentious/potentially derogatory claim. Tag: Reverted
- 18:3618:36, 5 June 2024 diff hist +198 Reiki I don’t think it’s overtag. As I’ve said, over half of the sources used were published more than 10 years ago. Tagging dozens of sources at one time of course “looks like” overcite, but it’s not. Btw, WP:OVERCITE isn’t WP:P&G. The tags shouldn’t be reverted indiscriminately without adequate reasons. Anyway, I’m switching some of the inline tags to section tags per concern. Tag: Reverted
- 17:1717:17, 5 June 2024 diff hist +317 Talk:Reiki →USE OF TECHNICAL TERMS AS BUZZWORDS: consensus Tag: Reply
- 17:1417:14, 5 June 2024 diff hist +12 m Talk:Reiki →USE OF TECHNICAL TERMS AS BUZZWORDS
- 17:1217:12, 5 June 2024 diff hist −1 Talk:Reiki →USE OF TECHNICAL TERMS AS BUZZWORDS: fix. Consensus
- 17:0917:09, 5 June 2024 diff hist +992 Talk:Reiki →USE OF TECHNICAL TERMS AS BUZZWORDS: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:0017:00, 5 June 2024 diff hist +441 Talk:Reiki →USE OF TECHNICAL TERMS AS BUZZWORDS: consensus Tag: Reply
- 16:5016:50, 5 June 2024 diff hist +1,105 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: consensus Tag: Reply
- 16:3216:32, 5 June 2024 diff hist +161 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: consensus Tag: Reply
- 05:0205:02, 5 June 2024 diff hist +212 Talk:Reiki →USE OF TECHNICAL TERMS AS BUZZWORDS: Agree Tag: Reply
- 03:1303:13, 5 June 2024 diff hist +461 Talk:Reiki →USE OF TECHNICAL TERMS AS BUZZWORDS: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:2801:28, 5 June 2024 diff hist +444 Talk:Reiki →USE OF TECHNICAL TERMS AS BUZZWORDS: Reply Tag: Reply
4 June 2024
- 18:5318:53, 4 June 2024 diff hist +351 Talk:Reiki →USE OF TECHNICAL TERMS AS BUZZWORDS: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:4818:48, 4 June 2024 diff hist +100 Reiki Tag for improvement Tag: Reverted
- 18:3918:39, 4 June 2024 diff hist +28 Reiki Tag Tag: Reverted
- 18:2218:22, 4 June 2024 diff hist +20 Reiki Rearrange; tag Tag: Reverted
- 18:1318:13, 4 June 2024 diff hist 0 Reiki Rearrange
- 18:0618:06, 4 June 2024 diff hist +19 Reiki →Technique: tag for improvement
- 17:4017:40, 4 June 2024 diff hist +168 Reiki Tag
- 17:2917:29, 4 June 2024 diff hist +48 Reiki →Research and critical evaluation: tag
- 17:2417:24, 4 June 2024 diff hist +58 Reiki →Research and critical evaluation: tag for improvement
- 17:2017:20, 4 June 2024 diff hist +19 Reiki →Conceptual basis: tag
- 17:1417:14, 4 June 2024 diff hist +66 Reiki Tag for improvement