Jump to content

User talk:GueroOxigenado: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nosebagbear (talk | contribs)
logged out
Line 16: Line 16:
:Skatenow, if Longhair is okay with it, would you agree to a conditional unblock on two conditions: an article-space pageban on the Eric Kraan article - this would let you propose edits on the talk page of that article; and a username change to a name that doesn't suggest a shared-usage? [[User:Nosebagbear|Nosebagbear]] ([[User talk:Nosebagbear|talk]]) 16:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
:Skatenow, if Longhair is okay with it, would you agree to a conditional unblock on two conditions: an article-space pageban on the Eric Kraan article - this would let you propose edits on the talk page of that article; and a username change to a name that doesn't suggest a shared-usage? [[User:Nosebagbear|Nosebagbear]] ([[User talk:Nosebagbear|talk]]) 16:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)


:Nosebagbear, I would certainly agree. Thank you for the suggestion. [[Special:Contributions/76.27.96.72|76.27.96.72]] ([[User talk:76.27.96.72|talk]]) 17:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Skatenow
::You need to make that note while logged in [I've checked that there's nothing on that immediate range to suggest they're block evading, just not checking they're logged in] [[User:Nosebagbear|Nosebagbear]] ([[User talk:Nosebagbear|talk]]) 17:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
::You need to make that note while logged in [I've checked that there's nothing on that immediate range to suggest they're block evading, just not checking they're logged in] [[User:Nosebagbear|Nosebagbear]] ([[User talk:Nosebagbear|talk]]) 17:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

:Nosebagbear, I would certainly agree. Thank you for the suggestion.[[User:Skatenow|Skatenow]] ([[User talk:Skatenow#top|talk]]) 17:55, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Skatenow

Revision as of 17:55, 25 September 2021

August 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Longhair\talk 03:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z17

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GueroOxigenado (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I do not receive any compensation for any edits or activity in wikipedia, I understand now that making an edit about skatenow by an account named skatenow can be seen as advertising, however, I was unaware of this policy. The intention was simply to update outdated information to current information as well as to try to add a profile picture of the correct individual Eric Kraan which this page does not provide and the mobile version is showing a picture of the wrong Eric Kraan Skatenow (talk) 04:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your choice of new username would be acceptable, but it still seems that you have a conflict of interest, even if you are not paid. Please explain how your future edits will be consistent with that policy, and tell any topics unrelated to Skatenow that you might edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

GueroOxigenado (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thank you for pointing out the COI information page, was unaware of this policy at the time of making the edits. As you may see, this account was made six years ago and this is the first time it has been used, ever. I will make certain that this account is never used to make an edit on this page, and suggest updates via the VOI noticeboard for peer review. live and learn. thank you

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Thank you for pointing out the COI information page, was unaware of this policy at the time of making the edits. As you may see, this account was made six years ago and this is the first time it has been used, ever. I will make certain that this account is never used to make an edit on this page, and suggest updates via the VOI noticeboard for peer review. live and learn. thank you |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Thank you for pointing out the COI information page, was unaware of this policy at the time of making the edits. As you may see, this account was made six years ago and this is the first time it has been used, ever. I will make certain that this account is never used to make an edit on this page, and suggest updates via the VOI noticeboard for peer review. live and learn. thank you |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Thank you for pointing out the COI information page, was unaware of this policy at the time of making the edits. As you may see, this account was made six years ago and this is the first time it has been used, ever. I will make certain that this account is never used to make an edit on this page, and suggest updates via the VOI noticeboard for peer review. live and learn. thank you |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Skatenow (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging blocking admin @Longhair:. Given the singular nature of the user's 2 edits - not adding a new advertorial URL, but just updating it to the current site, I'm inclined to believe them that it's a regular COI and extend enough ROPE to avoid breaching the rules in the future, subject to a article-space pageban (and a username change) - would this be okay to you?
Skatenow, if Longhair is okay with it, would you agree to a conditional unblock on two conditions: an article-space pageban on the Eric Kraan article - this would let you propose edits on the talk page of that article; and a username change to a name that doesn't suggest a shared-usage? Nosebagbear (talk) 16:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


You need to make that note while logged in [I've checked that there's nothing on that immediate range to suggest they're block evading, just not checking they're logged in] Nosebagbear (talk) 17:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nosebagbear, I would certainly agree. Thank you for the suggestion.Skatenow (talk) 17:55, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Skatenow[reply]