Talk:.338 Federal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Untitled

I have requested permission from Gun Blast to use an image they have of the .338 Federal. If permission is granted, I will upload their image. Kartano (talk) 04:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image permission was obtained, have uploaded the image and forwarded permission to Wiki. Kartano (talk) 05:03, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Velocity given for 180 gr bullet in 308 is at least 100fps too high! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lance may (talkcontribs) 03:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Velocity for .308 updated to 2600 fps as per factory loads, despite much better performance with handloads. --CaboverPete (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Photograph is not labeled, and from the neck angles, they look to be 3 different rounds.Fremry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.191.41 (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph now labeled, identifying each cartridge individually. --CaboverPete (talk) 20:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accuballs?

So the table that compares ballistic performance between the 338 federal and the 358 Winchester has a bullet listed as “accuballs”. I don’t know if this was a spellcheck error or on purpose, I know of no bullet named “accuballs”. I do know of a bullet by Nosler called an accubond. Help me out here and correct this if it’s wrong.

I don’t know how to correct a table. Anthonyjoehaynes (talk) 06:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]