User talk:Jfhutson

Archives

Collegiate Reformed Protestant Dutch Church

I reverted your move of this article. Please discuss this on the article talk page and get a consensus for the move. Thanks. BMK (talk) 02:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English-language hymns

Hi, although I processed your C2E request for Category:English-language hymns, it seems to me that it would be desirable to reinstate Category:English hymns, as Category:English-language songs gives the model for how the English-language hymns category should be constructed. That is to say, hymns – like songs – should be classified first by country of origin, and only categorised by language if they are from a country where the language is not the majority language. What do you think? – Fayenatic London 10:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I didn't realize they were doing it that way. That makes since. I'll go ahead and start splitting by country and make the English-language hymn cat look like the corresponding song one. Thanks. --JFH (talk) 13:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Let me know if you'd like me to help by making the bot transfer all the contents to another category under C2E again. – Fayenatic London 14:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Would you please call the bot off English hymns? I want to move the English ones there, but the bot moves them back. --JFH (talk) 22:01, 28 July 2014 (UTC)~~[reply]

Actually, if you could just move Category:English-language hymns back to Category:English hymns, that should work. I've pulled all the non-English hymns out. --JFH (talk) 02:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that is done now, and the bot should not change any new things that you place in there. – Fayenatic London 22:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you given up on Category:English-language hymns? It has been tagged for deletion as empty now. – Fayenatic London 14:23, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Based on our conversation, the only hymns that would go in that category would be English-langue hymns written in non-English speaking countries. I haven't come across any such hymns, so for now I have no problem with it being deleted. --JFH (talk) 15:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review of Mark Driscoll

I've started a peer review of the Mark Driscoll article. Since you've worked on that article before I would definitely welcome your input. -Sigeng (talk) 22:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reformed Churches of New Zealand.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reformed Churches of New Zealand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:36, 12 May 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Gospel Coalition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Gospel Coalition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propose Infobox academic

See proposal here Template_talk:Infobox_theologian#Propose Infobox academic :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sacramental union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regeneration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Presbyterian Church in the United States of America

Hey. Thanks for reviewing the article. I'm actually recovering from gallbladder surgery with complications right now, so I can't address the article right now. Eventually, I plan to improve it, and I can guess I will nominate it again. Thanks again. Ltwin (talk) 04:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Questia renewal

There has been a raised issue with Questia renewals because right now it requires signing up for a brand new account, but I was discussing it with other Library members. If you have ample amounts of saved data on the free account, I would consider holding it back for a bit, but I could give you another code to make a brand new account. Sorry to have missed your request earlier. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]