Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsuri Arshad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eggishorn (talk | contribs) at 20:44, 25 March 2022 (→‎Samsuri Arshad: unsigned + D). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Samsuri Arshad

Samsuri Arshad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another civil servant who does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Currently sourced solely with primary sources. Searches did not turn up anything in-depth about them. Onel5969 TT me 11:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police, Law, and Malaysia. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment that’s an awful lot of awards though…… The sources in the ms.wiki are rubbish, so no help there. I’m coming up with quite a few hits on a news search but really heed a native speaker to evaluate them. Mccapra (talk) 20:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree entirely. Atchom (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I ready clean up some mistakes of this article, please go check out.

I wonder why this article put in delete nomination, can someone give me the reason

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Mccapra - yes, but none of them by themselves, or as a group, meet any of the notability criteria. And the articles are not in-depth. Onel5969 TT me 10:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well I improve the articles already, maybe can stop deletion.

I just added some reference about this article.

Are this article can stop deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Normal rookie (talkcontribs) 03:20, March 25, 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete No evidence in the article or in searches or this discussion that this article meets the GNG or any relevant SNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]