Ernst van de Wetering: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Not sure if this properly refs the big claim, but it does the BLP job
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Dated {{BLP sources}}. (Build p613)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{BLP sources|date=July 2011}}
{{BLPrefimprove}}
'''Ernst van de Wetering''', PhD (born [[:Category:1938 births|1938]]) is a [[Netherlands|Dutch]] art historian,<ref>http://www.liberation.fr/culture/01012344710-rembrandt-peintre-modele</ref> considered the world's foremost expert on [[Rembrandt]] and his work.
'''Ernst van de Wetering''', PhD (born [[:Category:1938 births|1938]]) is a [[Netherlands|Dutch]] art historian,<ref>http://www.liberation.fr/culture/01012344710-rembrandt-peintre-modele</ref> considered the world's foremost expert on [[Rembrandt]] and his work.



Revision as of 13:51, 12 July 2011

Ernst van de Wetering, PhD (born 1938) is a Dutch art historian,[1] considered the world's foremost expert on Rembrandt and his work.

Background

Ernst van de Wetering was first trained as an artist at the (Dutch) Royal Academy of Fine Arts in The Hague. He received his doctorate in art history from the University of Amsterdam. Since 1968, he has been a member, and is now chairman, of the Rembrandt Research Project. He was art historian on the staff of Amsterdam's Central Research Laboratory for Restoration from 1969 to 1987 and, since 1987, has been full professor of history of art at the University of Amsterdam. He has published extensively on historic painting techniques, as well as in the field of theory and ethics of conservation and restoration.

In 1990, he succeeded Josua Bruyn as chair of the Rembrandt Research Project, the team of scholars that is charged with tracking down Rembrandt's works, authenticating them and, when needed, conserving the paintings.

As of 2011, the project has published five volumes on Rembrandt's work, the known Rembrandts, and the techniques used by the painter.

Assessment of Rembrandt

In most of his writing and lectures, Van de Wetering portrays Rembrandt as a painter who struggled to create as many marketable paintings as possible, and whose studio turned out a large number of paintings with varying amounts of work by Rembrandt and his apprentices. He was also able to discover a number of Rembrandt's works which had been repainted by the artist to make them more commercially acceptable.

In 2006, in celebration of Rembrandt's 400th birthday, Van de Wetering was quoted by the Associate Press saying: "My hope for the Rembrandt year would be that somehow we would become free of images, that we look with fresh eyes. So much research has been done, and so little of this research has come to the knowledge of the general public."

Studies of artists' use of light

Van de Wetering is the voice of dissent when it comes to the significance of light in Dutch 17th century painting. He doubts that it was a factor at all and says there were as many kinds of light as there were ways of painting. It was not a question of light, he adds, but of a painter's methods and style. He has also written several academic papers debunking the myth that Claude Monet painted only with natural light.

Awards

In 2003, Van de Wetering was presented with the Heritage Preservation/College Art Association Joint Award for Distinction in Scholarship and Conservation at Oxford University, where he has been a frequent guest lecturer.

Works

  • Rembrandt: The Painter at Work (2000). University of Amsterdam

External links

Template:Persondata