Talk:ROD 2-8-0: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 10:13, 19 May 2024

Trains: Locomotives Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Military history: Technology / British / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Discrepancy

After the first world war, These locos were loaned to the private railway companies while these companies refurbished their existing locos in the post war period. Later they were sold to these companies (and abroad). In the case of the GWR, I suspect that the original 20 were loaned (probably purchased later)? FreeFlow99 (talk) 08:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Early withdrawal

The GWR acquired their second batch of the locos in 1925, but withdrew 25 of these (lot 240) in 1927...1930, some of these served for as little as 28 months. Does anyone know why they were withdrawn so soon after being acquired? My source is Steam for Scrap ISBN 9 780906 899519 page 34. FreeFlow99 (talk) 08:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FreeFlow99: That's very much an oversimplification, see GWR 3000 Class. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 08:52, 19 May 2024 edit FreeFlow99 (talk \| contribs) 493 edits →‎Early withdrawal: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:13, 19 May 2024 edit undo Redrose64 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 264,933 edits →‎Early withdrawal: that's very much an oversimplification, see GWR 3000 Class Next edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	The GWR acquired their second batch of the locos in 1925, but withdrew 25 of these (lot 240) in 1927...1930, some of these served for as little as 28 months. Does anyone know why they were withdrawn so soon after being acquired? My source is ''Steam for Scrap'' ISBN 9 780906 899519 page 34. [[User:FreeFlow99\|FreeFlow99]] ([[User talk:FreeFlow99\|talk]]) 08:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)		The GWR acquired their second batch of the locos in 1925, but withdrew 25 of these (lot 240) in 1927...1930, some of these served for as little as 28 months. Does anyone know why they were withdrawn so soon after being acquired? My source is ''Steam for Scrap'' ISBN 9 780906 899519 page 34. [[User:FreeFlow99\|FreeFlow99]] ([[User talk:FreeFlow99\|talk]]) 08:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
			:{{replyto\|FreeFlow99}} That's very much an oversimplification, see [[GWR 3000 Class]]. --[[User:Redrose64\|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] 🌹 ([[User talk:Redrose64\|talk]]) 10:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)