Southern Baptist Convention: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 02:5002:50, 6 June 2024‎ Pbritti talk contribs‎ 140,732 bytes −1,088‎ Honestly, this whole episode seems like it probably isn't encyclopedic. No sustained coverage and the SBC's direct involvement seems minimal undo

curprev 22:2422:24, 2 June 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 141,520 bytes −45‎ This is for one thing a redundant clarification. Full disclosure: I am a member of a church that is in the SBC. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 03:1203:12, 2 June 2024‎ Ian Frye talk contribs‎ m 141,565 bytes +37‎ Changed wording to be more objective undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 15:2115:21, 26 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 141,528 bytes −32‎ I removed an incomplete sentence and changed a phrase to better reflect the resolution. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 15:1615:16, 26 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 141,560 bytes 0‎ There is no reason to capitalize "Black," or "White." It was inconsistently done anyway and looks unprofessional. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 22:1622:16, 25 May 2024‎ Twillisjr talk contribs‎ 141,560 bytes +46‎ Added category undo

curprev 15:2615:26, 11 May 2024‎ Pbritti talk contribs‎ 140,988 bytes +1‎ Split first paragraph undo
curprev 13:5913:59, 11 May 2024‎ 172.58.160.79 talk‎ 140,987 bytes +20‎ "the organization apologized for racial positions in its history:" meets TanRabbitry's goal of being NPOV and not inflammatory while also meeting the goal of specifying what they apologized for undo Tag: review edit
curprev 04:3404:34, 11 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 140,967 bytes −8‎ I reversed the last edit. I think that it is clear what the apology was for (see the citation) and this is more neutral and less inflammatory. Full disclosure: I am a member of a church that is in the SBC. undo Tags: Manual revert Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 01:0101:01, 11 May 2024‎ 172.58.109.186 talk‎ 140,975 bytes +8‎ apologized undo Tags: Reverted review edit

curprev 20:4120:41, 9 May 2024‎ Pbritti talk contribs‎ 140,967 bytes −437‎ Reverted 1 edit by TanRabbitry (talk): Again, this reads as overly emphasizing what might be seen as a silver lining. Better to refer to it consistently as a denomination and identify the general trend undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 19:0719:07, 9 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 141,404 bytes +437‎ Fine. But the other description is more accurate. You noticed, I am sure, that I left the other examples of that word. I re-added the up-dated statistics. I think some of the out-dated information there ought to be removed. Full disclosure: I am a member of a church that is in the SBC. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 15:1415:14, 9 May 2024‎ Pbritti talk contribs‎ 140,967 bytes −443‎ Reverted good faith edits by TanRabbitry (talk): It's still a denomination undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 07:0607:06, 9 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 141,410 bytes +443‎ I added a few more details from the latest statistics. I also rephrased the "short description." Full disclosure: I am a member of a church that is in the SBC. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 19:0119:01, 8 May 2024‎ SeminarianJohn talk contribs‎ m 140,967 bytes +5‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 19:0019:00, 8 May 2024‎ SeminarianJohn talk contribs‎ 140,962 bytes +726‎ updated total members for 2023, reported in 2024 undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 04:1404:14, 8 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ 140,236 bytes +986‎ As this seems to have caused some minor controversy, I reinforced that sentence with two additional citations. Both are "primary sources," but they fulfil the standard that no rational person could read the relevant sections and come to a conclusion different than the expressed sentence. Full disclosure: I am a member of a church that is in the SBC. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 01:5801:58, 7 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 139,250 bytes +87‎ I think the current sentence on the organization of the cooperation is less awkward than the last edit. I also reapplied the church figure, with an added citation. Full disclosure: I am a member of a church that is in the SBC. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 23:4523:45, 3 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 139,440 bytes −1‎ I removed a unnecessary space. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 23:2223:22, 3 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 139,441 bytes +83‎ I added some links to relevant articles. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 23:2023:20, 3 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ 139,358 bytes +836‎ I replaced the sentences removed apparently without reason, expanded them and added citations. Full disclosure: I am a member of a church that is in the SBC. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 20:3520:35, 2 May 2024‎ Pbritti talk contribs‎ 138,522 bytes +516‎ Restored revision 1221008232 by StefenTower (talk): Sources being behind a paywall is an invalid basis to remove them undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 20:0920:09, 2 May 2024‎ AlsoWukai talk contribs‎ 138,006 bytes −7‎ ce undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

curprev 09:0609:06, 1 May 2024‎ TanRabbitry talk contribs‎ m 138,013 bytes +37‎ I rearranged a sentence. Full disclosure: I am a member of a church that is in the SBC. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 05:0005:00, 1 May 2024‎ AlsoWukai talk contribs‎ m 137,976 bytes −2‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit