Peanut: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

3 June 2024

31 May 2024

30 May 2024

29 May 2024

19 May 2024

18 May 2024

12 May 2024

21 April 2024

  • curprev 04:0304:03, 21 April 2024TanRabbitry talk contribsm 70,589 bytes −16 To form a synthesis, I removed a name that a citation describes as rarely used today. Either way, it certainly has not been obsolete for "two hundred years" as a view at another one of the references shows. I think "goober" and "goober pea" are distinct enough to he listed separately, but I could be wrong. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 03:5603:56, 21 April 2024TanRabbitry talk contribs 70,605 bytes +533 I changed the beginning back. I realize the editor who removed a large section of it has many years of experience. However, aside from the fact that they left an extra space in the sentence, they didn't seem to review the sources. Those names are not obsolete and antiquated. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

19 April 2024

7 April 2024

1 February 2024

10 January 2024

3 January 2024

31 December 2023

26 November 2023

24 November 2023

19 November 2023

11 October 2023

16 September 2023

  • curprev 01:3201:32, 16 September 2023ThomasG-gPM talk contribs 68,915 bytes −438 →‎Composition: This whole paragraph is clearly wrong, Peanuts are obviously not the second largest source of vegetable oil and never have been. A 1986 book about food crops of Zimbabwe also seems to be a poor reference. Smells like an intentional hoax/vandalism.

12 September 2023

29 August 2023

21 August 2023

15 August 2023

14 August 2023

13 August 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)