Hitchens's razor: Revision history

4 June 2024

• curprev 19:2119:21, 4 June 2024‎ DJac75 talk contribs‎ 9,456 bytes +86‎ Added 2007 sighting from City Data Forums, 8 Oct 2007. undo

1 May 2024

• curprev 00:1900:19, 1 May 2024‎ Davide King talk contribs‎ m 9,370 bytes 0‎ →‎Analysis: ce ref order undo
• curprev 00:1900:19, 1 May 2024‎ Davide King talk contribs‎ 9,370 bytes +2‎ ce undo Tag: Visual edit

17 April 2024

• curprev 21:0021:00, 17 April 2024‎ BappleBusiness talk contribs‎ 9,368 bytes −2‎ no "a" in short desc undo Tag: Shortdesc helper

13 April 2024

• curprev 18:2618:26, 13 April 2024‎ OverlordQ talk contribs‎ m 9,370 bytes −181‎ Reverted edits by AxnoPampers (talk) (HG) (3.4.12) undo Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 18:1618:16, 13 April 2024‎ AxnoPampers talk contribs‎ 9,551 bytes +181‎ Typo undo Tags: Reverted possible vandalism references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

5 February 2024

• curprev 22:3622:36, 5 February 2024‎ Hippo43 talk contribs‎ 9,370 bytes −1,466‎ rm synth, trivial mention in sourxw undo
• curprev 22:2422:24, 5 February 2024‎ Hippo43 talk contribs‎ 10,836 bytes −1,411‎ rm unsourced comparison undo
• curprev 19:4619:46, 5 February 2024‎ Cordless Larry talk contribs‎ 12,247 bytes −1‎ →‎Analysis: Fixing punctuation undo
• curprev 19:3419:34, 5 February 2024‎ Hippo43 talk contribs‎ 12,248 bytes +6‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 19:3119:31, 5 February 2024‎ Hippo43 talk contribs‎ 12,242 bytes +1‎ →‎Analysis undo

7 December 2023

• curprev 02:5402:54, 7 December 2023‎ Wbm1058 talk contribs‎ m 12,241 bytes −15‎ redirect bypass from Julius Paulus Prudentissimus to Julius Paulus using popups undo

28 October 2023

• curprev 21:1121:11, 28 October 2023‎ Panian513 talk contribs‎ m 12,256 bytes −60‎ Undid revision 1182361943 by 78.17.122.249 (talk) - that doesn't seem to be the actual quote undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 21:0921:09, 28 October 2023‎ 78.17.122.249 talk‎ 12,316 bytes +60‎ I added the arguement that if the claim has no way of being proven even if it's true that the arguement of dismissal should become invalid undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 21:0621:06, 28 October 2023‎ Elli talk contribs‎ 12,256 bytes −53‎ Undid revision 1182361392 by 78.17.122.249 (talk) not what this is though? undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 21:0521:05, 28 October 2023‎ 78.17.122.249 talk‎ 12,309 bytes +53‎ I added the unless it is not possible to prove the claim as then the other person's argument of dismissal can't be taken into account undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

22 September 2023

• curprev 10:4610:46, 22 September 2023‎ Cordless Larry talk contribs‎ 12,256 bytes +1‎ Reverting per the explanation in comment undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 08:0508:05, 22 September 2023‎ Tavernsenses talk contribs‎ 12,255 bytes −1‎ →‎top: Fixed grammar undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit

10 September 2023

• curprev 15:5015:50, 10 September 2023‎ Jasonkwe talk contribs‎ 12,256 bytes −22‎ citation fix undo

5 August 2023

• curprev 03:5003:50, 5 August 2023‎ WriterArtistDC talk contribs‎ 12,278 bytes +32‎ Changing short description from "Epistemological razor" to "A general rule rejecting claims made without evidence" undo Tag: Shortdesc helper

27 July 2023

• curprev 06:4806:48, 27 July 2023‎ Cordless Larry talk contribs‎ 12,246 bytes −127‎ Reverting - if you don't have a source for something, don't add it undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 06:1506:15, 27 July 2023‎ Rudxain talk contribs‎ 12,373 bytes +127‎ →‎Criticism: Pointed out a "potentially-fallacious" idea that was used as criticism against the razor undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

21 June 2023

• curprev 16:1816:18, 21 June 2023‎ Richard-of-Earth talk contribs‎ 12,246 bytes −99‎ Undid revision 1160694420 by 50.52.12.232 (talk) This is mentioned in the body. It does not need to be in the lead. At least not in full. undo Tag: Undo

18 June 2023

• curprev 06:0906:09, 18 June 2023‎ 50.52.12.232 talk‎ 12,345 bytes +99‎ Added important historical background undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 May 2023

• curprev 06:0906:09, 17 May 2023‎ Richard-of-Earth talk contribs‎ 12,246 bytes −185‎ Undid revision 1155014480 by Majfoster (talk) WP:UNSOURCED. A statement like this needs to be attributed to a pundit. See WP:WIKIVOICE. undo Tag: Undo

16 May 2023

• curprev 03:4003:40, 16 May 2023‎ Majfoster talk contribs‎ 12,431 bytes +185‎ Additon of one sentence at the end of the criticism section to distinguish between the foundationalists argument and an axiom. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 April 2023

• curprev 18:4718:47, 17 April 2023‎ Snevearil talk contribs‎ 12,246 bytes +6‎ No edit summary undo

30 March 2023

• curprev 01:0801:08, 30 March 2023‎ Nightscream talk contribs‎ m 12,240 bytes +12‎ This is fundamental to the definition, and should not be a parenthetical, especially in the opening sentence of the article. undo

13 March 2023

• curprev 21:5821:58, 13 March 2023‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 12,228 bytes +1‎ Misc citation tidying. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | #UCB_CommandLine undo

19 January 2023

• curprev 13:0113:01, 19 January 2023‎ Wart Dark talk contribs‎ 12,227 bytes −37‎ removed Category:Philosophical arguments using HotCat undo

11 January 2023

• curprev 11:1511:15, 11 January 2023‎ Paradoctor talk contribs‎ 12,264 bytes +18‎ →‎Criticism: split out non-criticism; MOS:NOPIPE undo

22 December 2022

• curprev 21:2721:27, 22 December 2022‎ Cordless Larry talk contribs‎ 12,246 bytes −7‎ Undid revision 1128950216 by 172.12.73.227 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 21:1421:14, 22 December 2022‎ 172.12.73.227 talk‎ 12,253 bytes +7‎ →‎Analysis undo Tag: Reverted

13 December 2022

• curprev 02:1102:11, 13 December 2022‎ Lentower talk contribs‎ 12,246 bytes +35‎ →‎See also: add *{{annotated link|Sagan standard}} undo

6 November 2022

• curprev 07:5607:56, 6 November 2022‎ Richard-of-Earth talk contribs‎ 12,211 bytes −150‎ Undid revision 1120283382 by TheFactMinister (talk) WP:EDITORIAL. If you can find an academic pundit who said something like that, you can put this back and attribute it. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 05:4305:43, 6 November 2022‎ TheFactMinister talk contribs‎ m 12,361 bytes +150‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

19 October 2022

• curprev 02:2402:24, 19 October 2022‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 12,211 bytes 0‎ Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_toolbar undo

11 June 2022

• curprev 08:1808:18, 11 June 2022‎ Regulov talk contribs‎ 12,211 bytes −2‎ →‎Analysis: ce undo

5 May 2022

• curprev 10:2410:24, 5 May 2022‎ Novem Linguae talk contribs‎ 12,213 bytes −31‎ move definition to first sentence undo Tag: Visual edit

9 April 2022

• curprev 04:4404:44, 9 April 2022‎ Lawrencekhoo talk contribs‎ 12,244 bytes −13‎ →‎top undo

2 March 2022

• curprev 18:0318:03, 2 March 2022‎ Apaugasma talk contribs‎ 12,257 bytes −219‎ rv: that the burden only lies on the positive claim not on any negative claim, that atheism is not a claim because it does not assert anything, and that New Atheism is not atheism, are all legitimate opinions; however, Wikipedia is not based on the opinions of its editors, but on the points of view taken by reliable sources undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 13:3013:30, 2 March 2022‎ 50.78.252.196 talk‎ 12,476 bytes +210‎ →‎Criticism: Clarifed the criticism section. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 13:2513:25, 2 March 2022‎ 50.78.252.196 talk‎ 12,266 bytes +9‎ Corrected burden of proof logic: burden lies on the positive claim, not on any negative claim. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 10:4710:47, 2 March 2022‎ Apaugasma talk contribs‎ 12,257 bytes +456‎ Undid revision 1074811412 by 67.168.7.232 (talk) Hitchens came up with the razor in the context of an argument for atheism, so an argument that the razor would itself refute atheism surely qualifies as a type of criticism: it's a critique not of the razor itself, but of the idea held both by Hitchens and by many of his followers that the razor supports atheism; it's, in other words, a critique of the applicability of the razor undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 09:0009:00, 2 March 2022‎ 67.168.7.232 talk‎ 11,801 bytes −456‎ →‎Criticism: I deleted the entire section on Michael Antony's article "Where's The Evidence" because it is not a criticism of Hitchen's Razor. As the summary itself says "applying the razor to atheism itself would seem to imply that atheism is epistemically unjustified." Based on that and the content of Michael Antony's article it is clear the article is not a refutation or criticism of Hitchen's razor, it is a criticism of atheism, saying an argument commonly used by atheists (Hitchen's R... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

25 February 2022

• curprev 10:3810:38, 25 February 2022‎ CharlesHBennett talk contribs‎ m 12,257 bytes +1‎ →‎Criticism: "belongs" changed to "belonged" since Hitchens is no longer alive undo

23 February 2022

• curprev 05:1705:17, 23 February 2022‎ Yeeno talk contribs‎ 12,256 bytes −60‎ Restored revision 1069031142 by Apaugasma (talk) undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 05:0405:04, 23 February 2022‎ 2600:100f:b10c:fc12:f53c:bcb1:c2f1:b0e talk‎ 12,316 bytes +60‎ Moved added content between sections. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 04:5704:57, 23 February 2022‎ 2600:100f:b10c:fc12:f53c:bcb1:c2f1:b0e talk‎ 12,256 bytes −59‎ Moved added content between sections. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 04:3704:37, 23 February 2022‎ 2600:100f:b10c:fc12:f53c:bcb1:c2f1:b0e talk‎ 12,315 bytes +59‎ Added content. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit